Detalhes da Discussão
DRep Incentivization Framework
seomon
Descrição
Establish a robust incentivization framework that encourages consistent and informed participation and fair compensation from a diverse range of DReps. However, achieving this objective faces several technical obstacles, including designing fair reward mechanisms, ensuring the sustainability of incentives, and preventing the misuse of incentivization structures. Addressing these challenges is crucial to fostering a balanced and representative governance model for the Cardano community. This proposal covers:
- The definition and selection of meaningful parameters representing DRep activities and contributions.
- Development and iterative refinement of the incentive algorithm based on continuous data collection and feedback.
- Regular community engagement through workshops, GitHub discussions, and live events to validate the model's effectiveness and fairness.
- Detailed reporting on milestones, data outcomes, and algorithm performance to maintain transparency and foster trust.
Declaração do Problema
Currently, there is no structured and data-driven mechanism to reward Delegated Representatives (DReps) effectively. Without clear and fair incentives, DReps may lack motivation or clarity on how their contributions are valued, leading to inconsistent participation and suboptimal governance outcomes. The absence of a rigorous and transparent process to establish such reward mechanisms is likely to undermine the credibility and effectiveness of the governance process.
Benefício da Proposta
We will define parameters, monitor DRep behavior across key parameters to collect data and model incentives. Using this data, we'll create a mathematical formula that fairly rewards valuable contributions.This work will be transparently documented, -communicated, openly tested, and iteratively improved. The model will be guided by community feedback and evidence based work from experts.
Transparency:
- The community gains clear visibility into how incentives are structured and awarded. Engagement:
- Increased motivation for active, consistent, and high-quality participation from DReps. Fairness:
- A data-driven approach ensures rewards are proportional to measurable contributions, enhancing trust. Community influence over the process ensures a fair distribution model.
Scalability:
- A model adaptable for future governance needs and changes in community dynamics.The process can be replicated to create similar models for other governance bodies.
Principais Entregas da Proposta
The Project completion, we will deliver:
- a comprehensive DRep activity dataset
- a community dashboard visualizing DRep performance
- a tested incentive formula ready for implementation
- a formal implementable CIP document for governance integration
This initiative will significantly enhance Cardano's governance by aligning DRep incentives with ecosystem health, increasing participation rates, and improving proposal assessment quality.
Milestone 1: Initial Setup and Discovery (2 month)
Tasks:
- Initial Discovery research
- Infrastructure setup
- Creative Workshops (initial sessions)
- Basic Website Setup
- Initial parameter brainstorming
- Data Structuring (initial format setup)
Milestone Output:
- Initial discovery research report
- Documentation of initial creative workshop sessions
- Basic public-facing informational website
- Initial Script Development
Evidence of Completion:
- Published initial research report
- Workshop records (attendance lists, key outcomes)
- Operational basic website accessible to community
- Basic website available
- Initial monitoring script development
Milestone 2: Framework and Initial Model Development (2 month)
Tasks:
- Creative Workshops (follow-up sessions)
- Community Engagement
- Framework Development (initial draft)
- CIP Drafting (initial draft)
- Parameter Selection (preliminary set)
Milestone Output:
- Preliminary solution framework document
- First CIP draft submitted for community review
- Preliminary incentive parameters defined
- Initial structured data outputs
Evidence of Completion:
- Framework draft document
- Initial CIP draft available publicly
- Documented initial parameter definitions
- Script code available on GitHub
Milestone 3: Community Engagement and Data Collection Start (2 month)
Tasks:
- Active GitHub Monitoring
- Community Engagement
- Continued Script Development
- State of the art
Milestone Output:
- Active community engagement channels
- Participation in community events
- Improved monitoring script version
- State of the art paper published
Evidence of Completion:
- Community interaction logs (GitHub, events)
- Structured data examples documented
- Improved script code repository
Milestone 4: Model Building and Validation (2 month)
Tasks:
- Model Building (initial version)
- DRep Payment Calculation (initial simulation)
- Formula Design (preliminary structure)
- Data Testing and Validation (initial phase)
- Dashboard Development (initial version)
Milestone Output:
- Initial incentive model and simulations
- Preliminary incentive calculation formulas
- Initial functional version of the incentive dashboard
Evidence of Completion:
- Model documentation and simulation results
- Formula documentation and initial test results
- Dashboard live URL and initial feedback
Milestone 5: Dashboard Development and Refinement (2 month)
Tasks:
- Site Maintenance (updates)
- Community Engagement
- Continued Data Collection
- Further Data Testing and Model Refinement
- Framework Development
Milestone Output:
- Documentation of maintenance and minor updates
- Refined model based on collected data
- Framework architecture model
Evidence of Completion:
- Maintenance and update logs
- Refined model and testing report
Milestone 6: Final Model Validation and Community Oversight (1 month)
Tasks:
- Final Model Validation
- Community Engagement (final feedback sessions)
- Website and Dashboard Finalization
- Meeting Facilitation (key stakeholder meetings)
Milestone Output:
- Fully validated incentive model and dashboard
- Comprehensive community feedback report
Evidence of Completion:
- Final validation report
- Community feedback and meeting records
Milestone 7: Project Completion and Reporting (1 month)
Tasks:
- Final Milestone Reports
- Comprehensive documentation of all processes
- Transcripts and Relations documentation
- Fund Administration (final financial reporting)
Milestone Output:
- Comprehensive final project report
- Complete handover documentation
Evidence of Completion:
- Published final report and comprehensive documentation
- Financial transparency documents
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Engagement & Community Feedback
- Number of DReps engaged via GitHub, Discord, X, Town Halls or other channels: Target ≥ 60 individual DReps over 12 months
- Number of public GitHub discussions opened and actively maintained: ≥ 10
- Community workshops held: ≥ 12 (at least one every month) Workshop attendance rate: Minimum 8 participants each
- Create a model that is approved by at least 51% of active stakes in DReps through a governance info action.
Technical & Research Output
- Open Source monitoring script deployed and running with >95% uptime: by Month 3
- Structured dataset published with full ledger-based metrics: by Month 4
- Incentive model version 1.0 implemented and simulated with real data: by Month 6
- Number of incentive formula iterations with documented feedback applied: ≥ 3
- Addressed Goals of CPS-0020: 1
- Addressed use cases of CPS-0020: 3
- Feedback from contributors, DReps and Community via Form: > 4/5 - ‘good’
Transparency & Governance Integration
- CIP draft submitted to GitHub: by Month 4
- CIP accepted or actively under community review: by Month 10
- Dashboard showing real-time DRep activity and projected rewards live: by Month 7
- Final handover documentation with at least 1 peer review: by Month 12
Communication & Education
- Public posts, threads or summaries on X, Discord, and Catalyst forums: ≥ 4 per milestone
- State-of-the-art paper or summary published and shared with Cardano stakeholders: by Month 6
Sustainability & Handover
- Website and dashboard operational and documented for handover: by Month 12
- Maintenance plan including open-source repo, documentation, and contact points: published at project end
Detalhamento de Custos
Conceptualization
Tasks:
- Discovery
- Creative Workshops
- Framework Development
- CIP Writing and Drafting
- Cost: $43,000
Active Community Involvement
- Tasks
- Github support
- X support
- Online/Offline Events
- Cost: $37,320 ##Modeling of Incentives Tasks
- Parameter selection and refinement
- Model creation
- Payment simulations
- Formula design
- Data testing/validation
- Cost: $$40,800
Monitoring DRep Activity
Tasks
- Script development
- Ongoing monitoring/data structuring
- Cost: $15,000
Web Design
Tasks
- Basic Website
- Dashboard design/-implementation
- Website updates/maintenance
- Cost: $11,200
Science
Tasks
- State of the Art
- Additional Consulting
- Cost: $42,000
Administration
Tasks
- Project Management
- Milestones report
- Facilitating Meetings
- Managing Relations
- Administering Funds
- Cost:$31,680
Additional Cost
Tasks
- Software/Tools
- Travel Cost
- Cost: $8,900.00
Contingency
- Cost(12%): 27,962$
Revised Total Funding Calculation
- Labor Costs: $221,000
- Additional Costs: $36,862
- Grand Total: 257,488
Recursos & Duração
Duration: 12 months (structured across 7 milestones)
Team Size:
- 3 committed core members (already been working on this)
- 3 commited Cardano After Dark members (minimum involvement, joining when funding is available)
- 1 commited SME (no involvement, joining the project when funding is available)
- 1 SME prospect
Time Commitment: Approx. ~2160 total project hours over the entire duration.
Experiência
Already involved proposers
Seomon:
- Project Manager
- Cardano Ambassador
- Constitutional Alternate Delegate
- successfully closed out 9 Catalyst funded projects - https://www.lidonation.com/en/project-catalyst/users/634/
- Interim GMC Committee Chair
Lt. Assistant Professor Martin:
- Interim GMC voting seat member,
- Cardano Constitution Delegate,
- Telecommunication and cybersecurity specialization,
- Project Management and Business Development Strategy,
- xSPO official member,
- CSPA official member,
- Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy Blockchain and cryptocurrency assistant professor,
- Founder of Andromeda Way,
- Founder of Bulgarian Cardano Community.
Sebastian:
- EMURGO Blockchain Instructor
- Copywriter on over 20 projects
- Co-creator of Cardano Smart developer bot
- Blockchain consultant
Cardano After Dark:
Randall
- Software Architect with a focus on Cardano.
Jake
- CS PhD with focus on data visualization and professional experience incentive modeling
Patrik
- Senior full stack Software Developer
SME:
Elisabeth
- sociologist in work and organizational theory
Manutenção & Suporte
Website & dashboard continuity
We will provide a dedicated website featuring a publicly accessible dashboard summarizing DRep activity data and calculated rewards. This website and its dashboard will remain operational throughout the research period and beyond, as long as funding permits. During the active phase, our team will manage regular updates, backups, security measures, and ensure consistent accessibility and performance. Following the project's completion, the site will be maintained by our team with minimal updates, including hosting, minor bug fixes, and basic security upkeep. Alternatively, if integrated into Cardano’s governance infrastructure, maintenance responsibilities could transition into a community-led initiative. Annual hosting costs and basic maintenance are estimated at approximately $500, assuming no major redesigns are required.
Data & Script updates
The monitoring script developed to capture DRep activity data from the Cardano ledger will be maintained and updated regularly by our team throughout the project, ensuring reliable real-time and/or historical data collection. This script will run continuously to structure data effectively for integration into the incentive model. Additionally, we will open-source the monitoring script via GitHub, enabling community developers to contribute, maintain, or adapt it for future use. Periodic updates required to ensure ongoing compatibility with ledger changes will be clearly documented, facilitating an effective handover to a designated maintainer after the project's completion.
Model and Script Maintenance:
The incentive algorithm, once finalized and documented within a formal CIP, will be designed for scalability, adaptability, and ease of maintenance. Throughout the project, we will regularly maintain the monitoring script, adapting it to any changes in the Cardano blockchain to ensure accuracy, efficiency, and reliability. Technical support and periodic reviews will safeguard the effectiveness of the script and the incentive algorithm. Post-project, the continued maintenance and refinement of the algorithm and its associated monitoring script will depend on their adoption into Cardano’s governance framework. If officially implemented, governance bodies (such as the Cardano Foundation or Intersect) could assume responsibility for ongoing reviews, necessary adjustments, and support in response to evolving DRep behaviors and community needs.
Community Oversight
To sustain transparency, engagement, and continuous improvement, the project team will facilitate regular community check-ins, feedback sessions, and open forums such as GitHub discussions, Discord channels, and Town Hall meetings throughout the project duration. Community inputs will directly influence the iterative refinement and validation of the incentive model. Upon project completion, a clear handover process,including detailed documentation and a comprehensive final report, will empower the Cardano community to oversee, maintain, and potentially enhance the deliverables. Community feedback channels will remain active for at least six months post-project, allowing ongoing discussion, questions, and suggested improvements, thereby ensuring sustained community involvement and oversight.
Funding
The initial project budget covers all necessary costs associated with development, deployment, and initial maintenance, including website management, script updates, and incentive model refinement. Long-term sustainability beyond the 12-month project timeline will require securing additional funding or integrating maintenance costs into Cardano’s treasury system. To ensure continuity, a modest reserve from the allocated contingency budget can be utilized to bridge any immediate, short-term maintenance needs such as hosting or minor script updates if further funding is not immediately available. Any additional funding requirements identified during ongoing maintenance will be transparently documented and addressed through contingency funds or future funding proposals.
Endosso Suplementar
- https://tempo.vote/polls
- https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pull/997
- https://cardafterdark.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/drep-reg-and-drep-over-time-scaled.png
Alinhamento com o Roadmap
Sua proposta se alinha com algum dos Comitês da Intersect?
Civics Committee
Esta proposta está alinhada com o Roadmap do Produto e os Objetivos do Roadmap?
It doesn't align
Administração e Auditoria
Você gostaria que a Intersect fosse seu Administrador designado, incluindo atuar como auditor, conforme a Constituição Cardano?
Não
Informações de Propriedade
Enviado em Nome de
GroupNome do Grupo
Cardano After DarkTipo de Grupo
Software DevelopmentPerfis Sociais
https://x.com/cardafterdark, https://github.com/Cardano-After-Dark, https://discord.gg/pffzDQdXukPrincipais Dependências
The successful implementation of this proposal relies on several key dependencies, both internal and external to the Project:
-
Access to Cardano Ledger Data The Project requires consistent and reliable access to real-time and historical data from the Cardano Blockchain ledger to monitor DRep activities and behaviours effectively.
-
Open-Source Libraries and Tools We will leverage open-source libraries for data processing, modeling and visualization. The functionality and updates of these tools must remain compatible with our technical requirements throughout the 12-month period.
-
Community Participation The iterative refinement of the incentive model depends on active engagement from Cardano Community, including feedback from DReps, stakeholders, and governance participants during workshops, GitHub discussions, and live events. Limited participation could hinder validation efforts.
-
Technical Infrastructure The development and maintenance of the monitoring script, website, and dashboard necessitate stable hosting services, GitHub repositories, and analytics tools. Any disruption in these services, like server downtime or cost increases, could affect Project deliverables.
-
Event Organizer Support For travel related dependencies, such as attending Cardano Summit or other relevant events, we assume partial logistical support, like flights and accommodation, from event organizers. If this support is unavailable, we may need to draw funding from the contingency budget of the Project.
-
Governance Framework Stability The Project assumes that the current Cardano governance structure, including DRep roles and responsibilities, remains stable during the 12-month monitoring period. Significant changes to the governance model could require adjustment to our parameters and incentive formula.
Links de apoio
Comentários (14)
DREPS should not be paid except where travel to Cardano events is required. Compensation can introduce a voting Bias. Its a No for me.
I don’t believe we yet have a clear enough understanding of what the work and requirements for DReps will ultimatly look like, so research based on current situation and opinions would be premature and illinformed.
At this early stage, there has already been broad, qualified participation from volunteers committed to serving the chain. This spirit of volunteerism will likely be sufficient to sustain us for at least another year, given the ecosystem’s current needs.
Turning the focus toward compensation at this point feels premature, unnecessary, and even harmful. It risks shifting the mindset from service for the good of the chain to what incentives do I get for myself—undermining the ethos that has brought us this far.
Thus the proposal seems premature, unnessary, and harms the ecosystem by focusing a service mindset into a selfish one.
I’ve been following the DRep Incentivization Framework closely and, after reviewing the details, I’m casting a Yes vote.
While I’m cautious about overengineering governance, the absence of incentives risks declining DRep participation and weakening Cardano’s governance. This proposal’s data-driven approach, community feedback loops, and simulated reward testing before real payments stand out as thoughtful measures.
The integration of CIP-139 decentralization safeguards further reassures me that fairness remains central. Though some questions (like penalty tuning) remain, the team’s openness to iterate makes this a risk worth taking.
Thanks to the team—I look forward to stronger Cardano governance through this work!
While it's not quite clear to me what problem is being solved (for example, I as a Drep do not seek any financial means of valuation of my efforts, and in general I feel if you're making some useful contributions, community might reward it by entrusting you with a bit of extra voting power over time, etc), I'd be keen to see an InfoAction temperature check to gauge the sentiment amongst DReps themselves on the topic of incentives.
While I agree that a fair DRep reward model is necessary to strengthen participation, I did not see any reference in the proposal to mechanisms that prevent centralization of rewards—for example, safeguards to avoid excessive concentration among a few dominant DReps.
In Cardano’s SPO model, the saturation point ensures delegation remains decentralized. Is there any plan to introduce a similar mechanism—such as diminishing returns or diversity-promoting modifiers—within this incentive framework to keep reward distribution balanced and inclusive?
DReps serve as the community's spokesperson, actively participating in voting on governance actions and advocating for collective interests. They can register using keys, simple scripts, or Plutus scripts, and their voting power is proportional to the delegated ADA stake, with one ADA equaling one vote. As of recent data, there are 1,216 registered DReps, indicating significant community involvement (DReps List - Cardanoscan). DReps can include metadata in their registration to convey motivations, aiding stakeholders in delegation decisions, as specified in CIP-119. The role of DReps is crucial in Cardano's decentralized governance, especially post-Chang hard forks, which enabled DRep registration and delegation. However, the current system lacks structured incentives, potentially leading to voter apathy and centralization, as noted in community discussions.
The DRep Incentivization Framework looks to fill a critical need in Cardano's governance, establishing a fair and transparent incentive system for DReps. It aligns with community discussions and ongoing CIP efforts, with a robust plan for implementation and maintenance. I find value in this proposal, in due time incentivisation will be required and key metrics to pinpoint the important roles and responsibilities to include the key requirements to being a DRep will be needed for fair transparent rewards.
Budget Proposal Workshop Participant Feedback - Hosted by Japan Hub
Feedback Summary: ・Attempt to measure DRep contributions via GitHub and social metrics is too simplistic. ・Many DRep contributions are intangible and not captured by these metrics. ・Delegation itself acts as an incentive and recognition mechanism.
Suggested Improvement: ・Develop a more holistic evaluation method that captures both quantitative and qualitative contributions.
We respectfully submit this feedback for your consideration.
-
How will the success of the proposed incentivization model be measured? What KPIs or evaluation metrics are defined?
-
The proposal mentions community-driven refinement—what concrete mechanisms or incentives will ensure meaningful participation and feedback?
-
How will the model ensure neutrality and avoid over-rewarding certain behaviors, such as quantity-focused voting?
-
From CIP drafting to implementation, who will make the decisions and what is the expected process for integration into Cardano governance?
-
After the 12-month period, who will be responsible for maintaining the model, scripts, and website, and what contingency plans are in place if funding runs out?
-
For example, could you please include the following KPi and target: "Create a model that is approved by at least 51% of active stakes in DRep and SPO through information action"?(Since DRep alone has a self-interest bias, can you aim for approval of 51% or more of SPO?)
Você está pronto para participar?
Construindo juntos para impulsionar a Cardano.