DRep Profile
ranket
Regarding development and system design, I support the proposal to follow IOG-led Cardano until 2024. I basically agree with marketing and promotional activities. however, DRep participation rate is important for Cardano’s decentralization. However, the resulting lack of decentralization is acceptable and we respect the leadership of IOG and other core companies. However, if a rival team emerges that makes Cardano better, I will not have faith in IOG. I agree with the proposal that is the best way for Cardano to grow.
Objectives
Regarding development and system design, I support the proposal to follow IOG-led Cardano until 2024. I basically agree with marketing and promotional activities. however, DRep participation rate is important for Cardano’s decentralization. However, the resulting lack of decentralization is acceptable and we respect the leadership of IOG and other core companies. However, if a rival team emerges that makes Cardano better, I will not have faith in IOG. I agree with the proposal that is the best way for Cardano to grow.
Motivations
A certain period of time has passed since the start of DRep, and I decided to run to convey the voices of delegators that cannot be picked up by the current PR. This policy is to avoid negotiations such as delegation competition with other DRep. Regarding Cardano activities, he has been active as a stake pool operator and has also worked on many projects at Catalyst. Basically, we are working on a project that is sustainable and provides a long-term product that serves as a prototype for Cardano's use cases.
Qualifications
There are over 70 papers. The most cited papers have more than 500 citations. He has also received numerous academic awards in scientific field. Also more than 10 catalyst projects.
Payment Address
addr1q8rs47w3ctl68yamjevcxvrqku493v46wfcferuz46rczwswjyjpup4x428pm6m0kgmg6uepupc7tflt494kk9xpvknqr7g3za
Metadata Hash
e879ae328c3610a2458d07e40b3b29ff31696c43656ea76b7e3b31f33b921969
CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v2.03
For a complete list of changes, see "List of changes from v1.00 to v2.03". Here is a list of the major changes: * Preamble / Article I / Article III / Appendix II: Minor wording improvements. * Defined Terms: New definitions added for clarity. * Article II: * Simplified wording. * Removed the Budget requirement for treasury withdrawals. * Added a Roadmap requirement. * Introduced limited Execute Functionality (Requirement 7). * Removed outdated provisions (e.g., DRep/SPO Codes of Conduct). * Appendix I: * More precise definitions. * Fixed typos and inaccuracies. * Aligned with Article II changes on treasury withdrawals.
Cardano Constitutional Dept Workstreams
This proposal establishes a Governance Workstream Consortium which establishes decentralized execution framework, ROM Multisig Model, to support the delivery of constitutional dept workstreams in Cardano. Its core aim is to ensure that budgeted governance tasks are completed verifiably, transparently, and without relying on a single administrator.
Parameter change proposal - Lower minPoolCost to 0
(at the time of writing the gov.tools site did not have a Parameter Change dropdown value on Propose a Governance Action page implemented yet, although I hear it is in the works) This proposal is to change the parameter "minimum fixed rewards cut for pools (minPoolCost)" value from it's current value of 170 Ada to 0 Ada. This is to allow stake pool operators to set their fee structure as they see fit - without always forcibly taking a chunk out of pool rewards, the protocol-level action which results in continually growing gap (as the per-block reward continues to reduce over time, by staking design) in maximum ROI that a given small pool can offer compared to a big pool with similar fee structure in place.
Are You Ready to Participate?
Building Together to Drive Cardano Forward.