For a complete list of changes, see "List of changes from v1.00 to v2.02(Raw)". Here is a list of the major changes: PREAMBLE - Revised the wording slightly. DEFINED TERMS - Added definitions of key terms for greater clarity. ARTICLE I. CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN TENETS AND GUARDRAILS - Revised the wording slightly. ARTICLE II. COMMUNITY AND GOVERNANCE - -The expression has been simplified. -Regarding Treasury Withdrawal requirements, we have removed the Budget requirement and added the Roadmap requirement. -Added a provision allowing for limited implementation of execute functionality for treasury withdrawals (ARTICLE II Section 5 Requirement 7) -We have removed clauses that are no longer in operation, such as the DRep and SPO Code of Conduct. ARTICLE III. CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE - Revised the wording slightly. APPENDIX I. CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN GUARDRAILS -The terms have been defined in more detail. -Misspellings and inaccuracies have been corrected. -Regarding Treasury Withdrawal requirements, we have removed the Budget requirement and added the Roadmap requirement. APPENDIX II. SUPPORTING GUIDANCE - Revised the wording slightly.

This proposal establishes a Governance Workstream Consortium which establishes decentralized execution framework, ROM Multisig Model, to support the delivery of constitutional dept workstreams in Cardano. Its core aim is to ensure that budgeted governance tasks are completed verifiably, transparently, and without relying on a single administrator.

(at the time of writing the gov.tools site did not have a Parameter Change dropdown value on Propose a Governance Action page implemented yet, although I hear it is in the works) This proposal is to change the parameter "minimum fixed rewards cut for pools (minPoolCost)" value from it's current value of 170 Ada to 0 Ada. This is to allow stake pool operators to set their fee structure as they see fit - without always forcibly taking a chunk out of pool rewards, the protocol-level action which results in continually growing gap (as the per-block reward continues to reduce over time, by staking design) in maximum ROI that a given small pool can offer compared to a big pool with similar fee structure in place.